THE IMPORTANCE OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING THE "BIOPOLITICS" COURSE: THEORY AND PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/scientific.v3i53.395Keywords:
Biopolitics, autoethnography, biopower, biopolitics of population, medical anthropology, visual anthropology, anthropologically-integrated modelAbstract
Fundamentally, the primary objective of higher education extends beyond the simple, mechanical transmission of specialized knowledge; it centers on fostering critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and an interdisciplinary perspective among students. Key among 21st-century competencies is the ability to make sense of complex socio-political processes through the lens of human experience and subjectivity, alongside cultivating skills to apply these insights in real-world contexts. Crucially, anthropological concepts should not be introduced in isolation—as merely an additional theoretical branch—but rather dynamically integrated into the core logic and instructional framework of the "Biopolitics" course.
Building upon these premises, we offer potential approaches to addressing these educational challenges within the teaching framework of "Biopolitics." As part of this research, several instructional design models were developed, blending academic-theoretical analysis with interactive pedagogical methods. Primary emphasis was placed on research-based learning, the case-study method, the exploration of everyday biopolitical manifestations, and the application of an "Anthropological Lens" strategy.
The relevance of this study stems from the fact that, to date, the teaching of biopolitics in university curricula has lacked a systematic synthesis of anthropological knowledge and modern applied pedagogical methods. Our findings lead to the conclusion that applying an anthropological approach when teaching "Biopolitics" effectively stimulates students' analytical thinking and fosters practical skills. The data clearly demonstrate that embedding an anthropological toolkit into the instructional process significantly enhances student motivation and engagement with the subject matter.
References
Agamben, G. (1995). Homo Sacer: Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore.
Agamben, G. (2003). Stato di eccezione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Antonyan L. (2021). Vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya sredstv informacionno-kommunikacionnyh tekhnologij v processe obucheniya (Possibilities for using information and communication technology tools in the learning process). Obrazovanie v XXI veke, 1(5).
Arakelyan A., Avagyan A. (2024). Osobennosti ierarhii motivov v obrazovatel'noj motivacii studentov (Features of the hierarchy of motives in the educational motivation of students). Nauchnyj vestnik, 2(47).
Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Esposito, R. (2002). Immunitas: Protezione e negazione della vita. Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore.
Esposito, R. (2004). Bíos: Biopolitica e filosofia. Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore.
Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la sexualité, Tome 1: La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1997). «Il faut défendre la société»: Cours au Collège de France (1975-1976). Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (2004). Sécurité, territoire, population: Cours au Collège de France (1977-1978). Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France (1978-1979). Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Kleinman, A. (1988). The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lock, M., & Nguyen, V.-K. (2010). An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.
Pink, S. (2013). Doing Visual Ethnography (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Rabinow, P. (1996). Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rabinow, P. (2011). The Accompaniment: Assembling the Contemporary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rose, N. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2005). Biological Citizenship. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (pp. 439–463). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Scheper-Hughes, N., & Lock, M. M. (1987). The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1(1), 6–41.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Artak Khachatryan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

