ARMENIAN CHARITABLE TRADITIONS AND THEIR MOTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/scientific.v3i53.399Keywords:
Armenian Charitable Society of the Caucasus, charity, symbolic capital, national identity, Armenian merchantry, diasporic Armenians, institutionalizationAbstract
The article examines the formation and development of Armenian charitable traditions from the Middle Ages to the end of the 19th century within the combined framework of Pierre Bourdieu's "symbolic capital" and Robert Putnam's "social capital" theories. Priority is given to the characteristics of the institutionalization of charity and the motives for the transition to organizational structures. The aim is to reveal the stages of charitable development, their motives, and the dual function of charity: on the one hand, strengthening national solidarity, and on the other, reproducing social differentiation.
The study shows that Armenian charitable traditions passed through four main stages: early medieval church-centered charity, developed medieval individual-virtuous charity, church patronage and educational sponsorship of the 16th-18th century diasporic Armenian merchantry, and the institutionalized organizations of the 19th century (the Armenian Charitable Society of the Caucasus and others). Charity simultaneously served as an instrument of national mobilization in the absence of statehood and as a mechanism for converting economic capital into symbolic capital, thereby reinforcing the social role of benefactors.
The research findings demonstrate that charity among Armenians was not merely a purely disinterested ideal, but operated within the context of reproducing power, resources, and social influence, while simultaneously contributing to the development of the Armenian educational and cultural environment.
References
Ardzagang, 1882. (Ardzagang). № 17.
Bekhbudyan, S. (1987). Pervoe armyanskoe blagotvoritel'noe obshchestvo (The First Armenian Charitable Society). Echmiadzin, T-ZH.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital, in: Richardson J.G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, Greenwood Press, pp. 241-258.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard University Press.
Budugyan, A. (1901). Nuzhda i blagotvoritel'nost' (Need and Charity). Nor-Nahichevan, izdatel'stvo brat'ev YA.S. Avagyan.
Divan armyanskoj litografii (1977). (Divan of Armenian Lithography). vypusk 6, Erevan, Akademiya nauk Armyanskoj SSR.
Galstyans, A. (1891). Kratkij istoricheskij obzor 25-letnej deyatel'nosti Armyanskogo gumanitarnogo obshchestva Baku (A Brief Historical Overview of the 25-Year Activities of the Armenian Humanitarian Society of Baku). Baku.
Kavkaz (1881). (The Caucasus). N 227. https://dspace.nplg.gov.ge/handle/1234/304905
Kiragos Gandzakecki (1982). Istoriya Armenii (Armenian History). Erevan, sovetskij pisatel'.
Leo (1934). Hodzhaly, stolica, epizody iz istorii armyanskoj duhovnoj diplomatii (Khojaly, the capital, episodes from the history of Armenian spiritual diplomacy). tom pervyj, Erevan.
Leo (1911). Tridcat' let Armyanskogo blagotvoritel'nogo obshchestva na Kavkaze (Thirty Years of the Armenian Benevolent Society in the Caucasus). (1881-1911), Tbilisi, Mn. Izdatel'stvo Martirosyana.
Nor-Dar, 1892 (New Century). № 196.
Proizvedeniya Stepannosa Nazaryana s biograficheskim ocherkom (1913). (Works of Stepanos Nazaryan, with a biographical sketch). tom I. Tbilisi, Izdatel'stvo N. Aganyana.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.
Šagidanova, K. I. (2007)․ Blagotvoritelʹnaâ deâtelʹnostʹ bakinskih armân (Philanthropic activities of the Armenians of Baku). Vestnik obŝestvennyh nauk, N 1, c. 156-163.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vladimir Poghosyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

