RESOLVING PARADOXES OF PHYSICS IN THE UNIVERSITY STUDY
Keywords:main concepts of quantum mechanics, paradoxes of quantum mechanics, creativity, originality of the solution, ability to think independently
The article substantiates the thesis about the futility of the usual interpretation of creativity as originality. In order to make our position on this issue more convincing, we have given to the originality concept an appearance of contradiction. The discussion in the article leads to the conclusion thatthe category of creative thinking will be really effective if the main characteristic of the creativity were not originality but rather the ability to independent problem solving. The article presents the optimal steps for an independent solution of research problems. Authors introduce the idea of “easy paradoxes” for developing creative thinking.
Djidjian R.Z. & Gevorgyan M.R. (2021). Solutions of paradoxes and the methodology of their
use in the university course. Educational manual, Yerevan, Armenia.
Djidjian R.Z. & Gevorgyan M.R. (2014). The obvious and the non-obvious in the field of
philosophical questions of quantum mechanics. Scientific News, 2-3 (21-22), 83-9, Yerevan, Armeniа.
Djidjian R. (2016). Paradoxes of human cognition. Wisdom, 2 (7), pp. 49-57, Yerevan, Armeniа.
Djidjian R (2002). The secret of geniality. Noyan Tapan, Yerevan, Armeniа.
Djidjian R (2004). Getting Ready for Great Discoveries. YSU publ., Yerevan, Armenia.
Gevorgyan M.R. (2014). The problem of motion in microworld (A transformational analysis),
Wisdom, 1(2), 43-47, Yerevan, Armeniа.
Gordon F.S. (1961). Synectics. The development of creative capacity, New York.
Lipai T. P. &Gevorgyan M. R. (2021). Contemporary system of education: innovative nature
of the development and problems of training doctoral students. Labour and Social Relations, Vol. 32. Issue 2. P. 160-166. DOI: 10.20410/207378152021322160166.
OsbornA. F. (1976). Applied Imagination. New York.
Mach E.(1957). Knowledge and Error - Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry. Dordrecht: D.Reidel.
Aristotle (2018). Physics. Cambridge University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108181853
Bacon F. (1978). True Directions for the Interpretation of Nature. https://sato-1.ru/en/repairman/frensis-bekon-biografiya-filosofskoe-uchenie-frensis-bekon---biografiya/
Descartes R. (1989). Philosophy of Spirit and Matter by Rene Descartes. https://modacode.ru/en/dekart-biografiya-kratko-dokazatelstvo-bozhestvennogo/
Herschel W. (1831). A preliminary discourse on the study of natural Philosophy. Philadelphia. https://ia800306.us.archive.org/4/items/apreliminarydis02hersgoog/apreliminarydis02hersgoog.pdf
Maх (1909). Multi Chemistry Battery Chargers with Automatic System Power Selector. https://www.farnell.com/datasheets/77654.pdf
Mill D.S. (1914). System of syllogistic and inductive logic. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi1ktGf3Zf_AhUWVPEDHU1SACAQFnoECAwQAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fndl.ethernet.edu.et%2Fbitstream%2F123456789%2F54080%2F1%2F323.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2AcJqSAlbAIG5xLVvazQ8b
Popper K.R. (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Londan and New York. http://philotextes.info/spip/IMG/pdf/popper-logic-scientific-discovery.pdf
Gordon F.S. (1961). Synectics. The development of creative capacity. New York.
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination. New York.
Poya D. (1970). Mathematical discovery. Problem solving: basic concepts, study and teaching.
M.: Nauka: Fizmatlit.
Copyright (c) 2023 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.