THE INSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF THE POLICE IN MAINTAINING CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER IN CONDITIONS OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

Authors

  • TIGRAN GHAZARYAN YSU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/scientific.v1i48.195

Keywords:

constitutional order, civil disobedience, institutional guarantee, political stability, human rights, state institutions, democracy, accountability

Abstract

This article explores the pivotal role of the police in maintaining constitutional order, particularly in the context of civil disobedience. Across different times and cultures, when public protests and social movements become a visible expression of political conflict, law enforcement agencies face a complex moral and legal challenge — to maintain public order without infringing on civil liberties. Prominent legal and political scholars emphasize that police actions, like any institutional intervention, must respect the rule of law and the principles of human rights protection, especially when efforts to suppress waves of public dissent may contradict the very essence of constitutionalism.

The aim of this article is to analyze the institutional role of the police as a guarantor of constitutional order in the context of civil disobedience within Armenia’s political and legal framework. The analysis draws comparisons between domestic experience and international examples to identify mechanisms that allow for the simultaneous safeguarding of citizen freedoms and state stability. The article examines how the police act as protectors of the constitutional order while maintaining public order and upholding fundamental human rights. The main conclusion of the article is that institutional reform of the police and the strengthening of accountability mechanisms create the necessary conditions to reconcile the protection of constitutional order with the preservation of civil liberties.

References

Nacional'noe Sobranie Respubliki Armeniya (2011). Zakon RA «O svobode sobranij» (Law of the Republic of Armenia on Freedom of Assembly.) https://www.arlis.am/documentview.aspx?docid=67136 (17.05.2025).

Konstituciya Respubliki Armeniya (2015). (Constitution of the RA). https://www.arlis.am/documentview.aspx?docID=102510 (17.05.2025).

Dalton D. (1993). Mahatma Gandhi: Nonviolent power in action. Columbia University Press. https://www.asianstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/mahatma-gandhi-nonviolent-power-in-action.pdf (15.05.2025) .

European Court of Human Rights. (2006). Oya Ataman v. Turkey, Application no. 74552/01. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-78330%22]} (17.05.2025թ.).

France 24. (2010). Protesters stop neo-Nazi rally in Dresden. https://www.france24.com/en/20100213-protesters-stop-neo-nazi-rally-dresden(18.05.2025).

General Comment No. 37 on the right of peaceful assembly (article 21). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3884725?v=pdf (17.05.2025).

Gustafsson C. (2011). Crime prevention in Sweden. Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.https://bra.se/download/18.3007d3171926b2914f0453/1728402237450/2024_Crime-prevention-in-Sweden-2024.pdf (18.05.2025).

Human Rights Watch. (2021, January 25). Russia: Police detain thousands at pro-Navalny protests. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/01/25/russia-police-detain-thousands-pro-navalny-protests (18.05.2025).

Human Rights Watch. (2021). Police responses to peaceful protest.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/10/19/cuba-peaceful-protesters-systematically-detained-abused (17.05.2025).

King M. L. Jr. (1963). Letter from Birmingham Jail.

https://www.csuchico.edu/iege/_assets/documents/susi-letter-from-birmingham-jail.pdf (17.05.2025)

Norwegian Police Directorate (2020). Police response to Black Lives Matter protests in Norway. https://thebattleground.eu/2020/12/02/black-lives-matter-reaches-norway (18.05.2025).

The Guardian (2019). Police use water cannon and teargas on Paris protesters. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/12/police-use-water-cannon-and-teargas-on-paris-protesters-gilets-jaunes (18.05.2025) .

Downloads

Published

02-06-2025